|
Sponsored
by Wake Forest University School of Medicine
and National Families in Action |
Marijuana
|
Common
Gene Variant May Offer Protection Against Marijuana Dependence |
New
research shows that specific variations in the cannabis receptor gene
(CB1) may be
associated with the development of one or more symptoms of marijuana
dependence in
adolescents. This is one of the first studies looking specifically at
the link between marijuana
dependence and CB1 variations.
Background:
Marijuana is the most commonly abused illegal substance among adolescents
and
young adults, and those who begin using at this stage are about twice
as likely as adults to
become dependent. Genetic variations in the CB1 receptor—the brain
target for the psychoactive
ingredient in marijuana—is a logical candidate gene to study as
a potential contributor to
vulnerability to marijuana dependence. Therefore, researchers examined
the associations between
specific variants in the CB1 gene and the rates of marijuana dependence.
Study
Design: The scientists collected DNA from 541 youths aged 17
or older who had used
marijuana at least five times recently. After interviews to identify
one or more DSM-IV symptoms of dependence, 327 were established as cases;
the remaining 214 had no symptoms and served as controls. All subjects
were genotyped for four specific DNA sequence variations of the CB1
gene.
What
They Found: One CB1 variant (found in 21 percent of the general
population) was associated with a lower rate of having one or more marijuana
dependence symptoms, while two others (present in 12 percent of the
general population) were linked to increased likelihood of developing
dependence symptoms.
|
|
Comments
from the Authors: Identifying gene variants that may afford
some protection against
marijuana dependence may have important implications for intervention.
However, it is likely that multiple genes and their interactions with
environmental events influence marijuana and other drug addictions.
Therefore, some level of genetic protection may not necessarily protect
an adolescent from becoming dependent on drugs or suffering other related
health consequences.
What’s
Next: Future studies should examine these genetic variants
for other drug-related traits, as
well as additional DNA sequence variations for possible drug abuse associations.
Publication:
The study, led by Dr. Christian J. Hopfer of the University of Colorado,
was published
in volume 141B, pages 895-901 (2006) of the American Journal of
Medical Genetics Part B
(Neuropsychiatric Genetics).
NIDA NewsScan,
August 22, 2007 |
Adolescents
Also Can Experience Marijuana Withdrawal Symptoms; Differences In
Severity Between Teens, Adults Noted |
Scientists
at the University of Vermont report that adolescents who smoke marijuana
regularly and are trying to quit can experience the same withdrawal
symptoms as adults, although the prevalence and magnitude of these symptoms
are lower than those seen in previous research among adults.
The scientists
collected information from 72 adolescents--primarily young white males
between 14 and 19 years of age seeking outpatient treatment for marijuana
abuse. Their substance abuse behavior was measured by means of self-report
questionnaires and interviews. The participants also rated the presence
and severity of specific symptoms known to be associated with drug withdrawal.
The scientists
observed that 78 percent of the participants reported having at least
2 symptoms, 58 percent reported at least 4 symptoms, and 44 percent
reported at least 6 symptoms. The most common symptoms were craving
for marijuana, depression, irritability, restlessness, sleeping difficulties,
hostility, loss of appetite, increased aggression, anxiety, and headache.
At least 22 individuals rated their marijuana craving, depression, irritability,
and sleep problems as moderate, with craving for marijuana being the
only symptom listed as severe. |
|
What
it means: Much of the research on marijuana withdrawal has
been conducted in adults, yet youth age 20 and under comprise over half
of all U.S. treatment admissions for marijuana abuse. This study shows
that adolescents who abuse marijuana experience withdrawal symptoms
similar to those seen in adults upon drug abstention. However, difference
in symptom severity in adolescents compared with adults may reflect
less frequent use of the drug by teens. The withdrawal syndrome could
have a negative impact on and contribute to its continued use in young
people who attempt to stop.
Graduate student
Ryan Vandrey, Dr. Alan Budney, and their colleagues published these
NIDA-supported findings in the May 9, 2005 issue of Drug and Alcohol
Dependence.
NIDA NewsScan,
September 7, 2005 |
A
Healthy Start: Some Parenting Practices May Protect Youth From Early
Marijuana Use |
Parenting
practices during the middle years of elementary school, such as supervision
and monitoring, may affect adolescent initiation of marijuana use, according
to a new NIDA-supported study conducted by Dr. Chuan-Yu Chen and colleagues
from the Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health.
The scientists
followed 1,222 youth from elementary school through young adulthood
to determine if early parenting practices protect youth from early onset
of marijuana use. The researchers measured three dimensions of parenting--parental
monitoring, parental involvement/reinforcement, and coercive parental
discipline parenting (attempts to correct child behavior by using serious
threats such as physical and nonphysical punishment)--as well as opportunity
to first try marijuana.
The scientists
found that children with the lowest levels of parental monitoring and
parental involvement/ reinforcement were almost 30 percent more likely
to try marijuana for the first time when compared with the most highly
monitored children. Similarly, children with higher levels of coercive
discipline were more likely to try the drug for the first time. Overall,
the scientists observed a delay and reduction in the opportunity to
first try marijuana among children with the highest levels of parental
involvement/reinforcement, which lasted through early adulthood. |
|
What
it means: Numerous studies have documented associations between
parenting practices and an array of health-compromising behaviors in
adolescents. The results of this study expand upon existing evidence
and suggest that parenting practices such as early increased monitoring
and supervision may have lasting effects by reducing and delaying marijuana
use through young adulthood. Additional research is needed to better
understand the role of parental practices in preventing and delaying
adolescent drug use.
This study
was published in the June 2005 issue of Pediatrics.
NIDA NewsScan,
September 7, 2005 |
Heavy
Abuse of Marijuana Linked to Inferior Decision-making Skills, Altered
Brain Activity |
Men
who smoke marijuana heavily are less successful than moderate smokers
or nonsmokers on tasks requiring decision-making. This difference remains
even after a brief period of abstinence, according to a study by Dr.
Karen Bolla of The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions.
She and her
colleagues recruited 11 adult male marijuana smokers and 11 healthy
male controls. When the marijuana smokers had been abstinent for 25
days, the scientists tested the participants to identify decisionmaking
differences. Then, using positron emission tomography (PET), the researchers
were able to see and record which brain regions the individuals used
during the test.
The scientists
noted that heavy marijuana abusers performed significantly worse than
moderate marijuana abusers. PET scans showed that heavy marijuana abusers
had less activation in regions of the right side of the brain that are
involved in decision-making, and greater activation in areas on the
left side of the brain. The scientists speculate that the brains of
these individuals are recruiting other regions, like the left cerebellum,
to compensate for the poorly functioning decision-making areas. |
|
What
it means: These findings suggest that heavy marijuana abuse
has a harmful effect on key processes within the brain, and may make
the individual more sensitive to immediate rewards, less sensitive to
losses, and slow to learn from previous mistakes. Damage to areas of
the brain associated with decision-making can significantly increase
a person's vulnerability to addictive behaviors and make them more resistant
to treatment.
The scientists
published the study in the June 2005 issue of the journal NeuroImage.
NIDA
NewsScan, August 23, 2005 |
Smoking
Marijuana Alters Blood Flow in the Brain |
A
recent report shows that marijuana smokers experience changes in blood
flow patterns in their brains, and these changes persist in heavy users
of the drug even after a month of abstinence.
Scientists
led by Dr. Ronald Herning of NIDA's Intramural Research Program measured
blood flow through the anterior and middle cerebral arteries in 54 marijuana
users (11 light, 23 moderate, and 20 heavy) and compared the results
with observations of blood flow in 18 similarly aged adults who did
not use the drug. They took measurements after 3 days of admission to
the study, and after 28-30 days of monitored abstinence.
Results showed
that the speed of blood flow through the arteries at the beginning and
end of the study was significantly higher in all 3 groups of marijuana
users than in the control group. Measurements taken at the beginning
of the study also showed that marijuana users demonstrated higher resistance
to blood flow through their brain arteries. This observation persisted
in the heavy marijuana users during the 30 days of not smoking, while
resistance to blood flow improved in the other 2 groups. |
|
What
it means: The findings suggest that smoking marijuana, the
most commonly used illegal substance in the United States, may alter
blood vessels in the brain. Future research is needed to determine whether
the increased resistance to blood flow seen in heavy users of the drug
is reversible and determines the health consequences. The findings from
this study also could help explain the drug's effects on memory, learning,
and problem solving.
The
researchers published their findings in the February 8, 2005 issue of
the journal Neurology.
NIDA
NewsScan, August 23, 2005 |
Study
Investigates Short-Term Effects of Marijuana Use on HIV+ Patients
|
Researchers
from the University of California, San Francisco, have found that patients
infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) may not experience
adverse effects on cell counts or viral load from short-term marijuana
use.
In the 3-week
trial, the researchers assigned 62 HIV+ patients to use marijuana cigarettes,
cannabinoid capsules, or a placebo three times a day before meals. All
of the patients were on antiretroviral regimens containing protease
inhibitors for at least 8 weeks before the study began. Fifty-eight
percent of the patients entered the study with levels of HIV circulating
in their blood below the limit currently detectable by the usual tests.
Overall, there
were no significant changes in the levels of HIV in the patients’ blood.
Compared to the placebo group, CD4+ and CD8+ T cell levels rose slightly
in the marijuana and cannabinoid capsule groups. |
|
What
it means: This study indicates that short-term use of marijuana
may not substantially elevate viral load in individuals with HIV infections
who are receiving stable antiretroviral regimens containing protease
inhibitors. However, the researchers say that these findings need to
be confirmed with larger and longer trials. They also caution that these
results cannot be extrapolated to the potential effects of marijuana
available on the street because the marijuana used in this study was
of known potency and content.
Dr.
Donald Abrams and colleagues published this study, funded in part by
the National Institute on Drug Abuse, in the August 19 issue of the
Annals of Internal Medicine.
NIDA
NewsScan, December 12, 2003 |
Starting
Marijuana Use in Mid-Teens or Younger May Result in Cognitive Impairment
Later in Life But Reasons are Unclear
|
There
is evidence that individuals who start to smoke marijuana at an early
age—while the brain is still developing—show deficits in cognition which
are not seen in individuals who begin use of the drug when they are
older. The reasons for this difference are unclear.
Scientists
from the Harvard Medical School and from the intramural research program
of the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) found lasting cognitive
deficits in those who started to smoke marijuana before age 17. The
researchers analyzed neuropsychological test results from 122 long-term
heavy users of marijuana and 87 subjects who had used marijuana only
a few times (control subjects). Sixty-nine of the 122 users started
using marijuana at age 17 or before. The subjects were between the ages
of 30 and 55 at the time of the study, and all had refrained from any
drug use 28 days prior to testing.
Individuals
who started using marijuana at age 17 or younger performed significantly
worse on the tests assessing verbal functions such as verbal IQ and
memory of word lists than did those who started using marijuana later
in life or who had used the drug sparingly. There were virtually no
differences in test results among the individuals who started marijuana
use after age 17 and the control subjects.
|
|
The
investigators suggest three possible hypotheses that might explain these
differences. One possibility is that early-onset smokers had lower innate
cognitive skills before they ever started smoking marijuana. A second
possibility is poor learning of certain cognitive skills by young users
of marijuana who neglect school and academic pursuits. The third and
most ominous possibility is that marijuana itself has a neurotoxic effect
on the developing brain. According to the authors, further research
will be required to determine the relative contributions of these three
factors.
What
it means: Youth who use marijuana before their midteens may
show long-term deficits in certain verbal skills—but the reasons
for these deficits are not yet clear.
Dr.
Harrison Pope and colleagues published the study in the March 2003 issue
of the journal Drug and Alcohol Dependence.
NIDA
NewsScan, May 2, 2003 |
Concurrent
Use of Tobacco and Marijuana May Hamper Cigarette Smoking Cessation
Efforts
|
Tobacco
smokers who also smoke marijuana may be less likely to quit smoking
tobacco and less likely to try to quit than those who do not smoke marijuana,
according to a study by researchers at The Johns Hopkins University.
Dr. Daniel Ford and colleagues interviewed 431 adults who had reported
being current tobacco smokers in a study conducted 13 years earlier.
In the baseline interview, more than 40 percent of the participants
reported having smoked marijuana, with more than 25 percent reporting
using it within the previous 30 days (recent use) and 9 percent reported
daily use for two weeks or more. At the 13-year follow-up, 79 percent
of participants who had reported smoking tobacco at baseline were still
smoking it.
Recent and
daily use of marijuana at baseline were more predictive of continued
tobacco smoking than use of marijuana more than a month prior to baseline.
Participants who reported recent use were about twice as likely to continue
to smoke tobacco 13 years later compared those who did not use marijuana
within the preceding 30 days. Those who reported daily marijuana use
were over three times more likely to still smoke tobacco. About 66 percent
of recent marijuana users reported trying to quit tobacco during the
following 13 years compared to 80 percent of those who had never used
marijuana. |
|
What
it means: These findings suggest that marijuana use may interfere
with tobacco cessation attempts. However, there is no evidence that
marijuana use can substitute for tobacco use.
This
study, funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse, was published
in the August 2002 issue of Drug and Alcohol Dependence.
NIDA
NewsScan, April 9, 2003 |
Alcohol
Use Prior to Smoking Marijuana Results in Increased THC Absorption
|
Scientists
at McLean Hospital/Harvard Medical School observed that male volunteers
who drank alcohol (vodka mixed with orange juice) prior to smoking marijuana
detected the effects of marijuana more quickly, reported more episodes
of euphoria, and had higher levels of THC in their blood than did subjects
who smoked marihuana without first ingesting alcohol.
The
investigators concluded that alcohol might increase the absorption of
THC, the active ingredient of marijuana, into the body, resulting in
a higher high than is experienced when using marijuana alone. |
|
What it means: Marijuana and alcohol are often used together,
but little is known about why they are combined. The results of this
experiment suggest that these two drugs are used to maximize the desired
effects of the drug experience and so may explain the popularity of
this combination.
The
study was published in Volume (issue): 64 (2) 2001 of the journal
Drug and Alcohol Dependence by lead investigator Dr. Scott
E. Lukas.
NIDA NewsScan, January 30, 2002
|
|
Scientists
Show Marijuana Use Affects Learning, Other Memory Skills
|
Researchers
at the McLean Hospital/Harvard Medical School have found that heavy,
long-term marijuana use produces memory impairment for days or even
weeks after users stop smoking.
To
ascertain the effects of marijuana use on memory and other cognitive
skills, the Harvard research team recruited 180 individuals between
the ages of 30 and 55. About one-third of the subjects were current
heavy users who had smoked marijuana at least 5,000 times in their lives
(equivalent to using the drug at least once a week for 13 or more years)
and who were smoking daily at the time they entered the study; another
third were former heavy users. Individuals inthe control group had used
marijuana at least once but fewer than 50 times in their lives. All
of the subjects were asked to abstain from marijuana for 28 days, and
their drug abstinence was confirmed by urine samples. They were administered
a battery of tests to assess general intellectual function, abstraction
ability, attention span, verbal fluency, and ability to learn and to
recall new verbal and visuospatial information just before and then
on the 1st, 7th, and 28th days ofabstinence. At days 0, 1, and 7, |
|
current
heavy users of marijuana scored significantly lower than the control
subjects on recall of word lists, but by day 28, there were virtually
no differences among the groups on any of the tests.
Cognitive
deficits were detectable at least 7 days after heavy marijuana use,
but these changes appeared to dissipate within a few weeks, after THC
(tetrahydrocannabinol), the active ingredient of marijuana, and its
metabolites have cleared the body.
What it means: This study clearly points out that marijuana
is not a benign substance. By impairing memory and other cognitive functions,
smoking marijuana can negatively affect academic achievement and other
life skills.
Lead
investigator Dr. Harrison G. Pope, Jr. published the study in the October
2001 issue of Archives of General Psychiatry.
NIDA NewsScan, October 16, 2001
|
|
Adult Male Mice Exposed to Methamphetamine In Utero Have Increased
Neurotoxicity Risk
|
Researchers
at the University of Chicago, in experiments with mice, have found that
prenatal exposure to methamphetamine increases response to the toxic
effects of the drug in adult males. Some effects of prenatal methamphetamine
exposure were observed in female offspring, but were much less than
those seen in the males.
The
investigators say these findings may raise concerns for male methamphetamine
abusers whose mothers used the drug while pregnant. The neurotoxic risk
from using methamphetamine as adults may be greater for men who were
exposed prenatally. Methamphetamine toxicity is characterized by persistent
decreases in the levels |
|
of dopamine and serotonin in certain brain regions. It is known that
in humans, dopamine deficits are associated with symptoms of Parkinson's
disease.
What it means: This finding, coupled with the increasing use
of club drugs, such as methamphetamine, by women of childbearing age,
makes this issue a potential public health concern.
The
researchers, led by Dr. Alfred Heller, published their findings in the
August 2001 issue of the Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental
Therapeutics.
NIDA NewsScan, October 16, 2001 |
|
Study
Finds That Beliefs About Health Effects of Cigarette Smoking Change with
Age
|
Surveys
of more than 7,000 individuals questioned periodically from middle school
through their mid-30’s about their beliefs concerning the risks
from smoking cigarettes and the value they place on health reveal that
these attitudes change with age.
A
research team from Arizona State University and Indiana University drew
participants for the study from a large, Midwestern community. At the
most recent assessment, 26 percent smoked cigarettes. The researchers
found that:
•
Between the ages of 11 and 14, the perception that smoking would harm
one’s own health decreased. However, between the ages of 15 and
18 and continuing to age 24, there was an increased belief that smoking
can be harmful to one’s personal health.
•
Throughout adolescence and young adulthood, there was a small but statistically
significant increase in the belief that cigarette smoking is harmful
to people’s health in general.
•
Between the ages of 15 and 18, the value that adolescents placed on
health decreased. However, the value placed on health increased starting
at age 19 and continued to increase up to age 29.
•
Between ages 11 and 14, belief in the positive psychological |
|
consequences
of smoking increased; however this trend reversed between ages 15 and
18.
•
Between 11 and 14, the belief that cigarettes are addicting decreased,
but between the ages of 15 and 18 and between ages 19 and 24, both smokers
and nonsmokers increased their belief that cigarettes are addicting.
•
Across all age groups, those who smoked were significantly less likely
to believe that smoking is harmful to either health in general or to
their own personal health, and smokers placed significantly less value
on health than did nonsmokers.
What it means: Smoking interventions aimed at adolescents must
counter the perception among middle school students that cigarette smoking
does not pose a risk of addiction or a risk to one’s own health,
and must counter the declining values placed on health by high school
students.
The
research team led by Drs. Laurie Chassin and Clark Presson from Arizona
State University and Dr. Steven J. Sherman from Indiana University published
the study in the September, 2001 issue of Health Psychology.
NIDA
NewsScan, January 30, 2002 |
|